Revealing The Biggest Crime In American History-Without Exposing The Victim(s)' Business Or Technological Secrets

  • HomeClick to open the Home menu
    • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION GO TO BLOG
  • REALITY TELEVISION COMPETITION SERIES
  • Contest Entry Fee
  • RECOMMENED BOOKS
  • EARN MONEY AS AN EVENT PLANNER
  • Mobile Applications
  • MORE EVIDENCE

Home

UPDATED VERSION OF THIS WEBSITE CAN BE FOUND HERE CLICK HERE

UPDATED VERSION OF THIS WEBSITE CAN BE FOUND HERE CLICK HERE 

UPDATED VERSION OF THIS WEBSITE CAN BE FOUND HERE CLICK HERE 

 

 

 

$7 MILLION PRESIDIO-JOURNALISM FRAUD CONTEST

 

What Is The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest?

 

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest is a contest that will pay $1 million to the contestant or team of contestants that is the first to provide the best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, the owner of BiggestCrime.com.

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will also pay $1 million to the contestant or team of contestants that is the first to provide the second, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will also pay $1 million to the contestant or team of contestants that is the first to provide the third, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will also pay $1 million to the contestant or team of contestants that is the first to provide the fourth, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will pay $500,000 to the contestant or team of contestants that is the first to provide the fifth, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will also pay $500,000 to the contestant or team of contestants that is the first to provide the sixth, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will pay $100,000 EACH to the contestants or teams of contestants that are the first to provide the next ten, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.

The $7 Million Presidio-Journalism Contest will pay $50,000 EACH to the twenty contestants or teams of contestants that are the first to provide the next twenty, best and most useful information, evidence, and/or explaination, that help to prove that the December, 2001, San Francisco magazine article, "Trouble In The Presidio," by Kerry Tremain, was commissioned, written, and/or published, primarily to cause, justify, and/or support, the removal and replacement of one or more top contract proposal decision-makers at the Presidio Trust, such as the then Executive Director, James Meadows, the then Director of Operations, Bruce Anderson, etc., so that the conspirators could better empower one or more other person(s) to make the types of contract-proposal award decisions that would better faciliate the conspirators efforts to ulitize fraud in their misappropriation of the extremely valuable confidential information belonging to Robert Evans, owner of BiggestCrime.com.

 

The first prize winner or winning team shall receive the $1 Million payment whenever Robert Evans receives $5 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans.  The second prize winner or winning team shall receive the $1 Million payment whenever Robert Evans receives $10 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans.  The third prize winner or winning team shall receive the $1 Million payment whenever Robert Evans receives $15 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans. 

 

The fourth prize winner or winning team shall receive the $1 Million payment whenever Robert Evans receives $20 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans.

 

The fifth prize winner or winning team shall receive the $500,000 payment whenever Robert Evans receives $25 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans

 

The sixth prize winner or winning team shall receive the $500,000 payment whenever Robert Evans receives $25 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans

 

The ten $100,000 prize winners or winning teams shall EACH receive the payment whenever Robert Evans receives $30 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans.

 

The twenty $50,000 prize winners or winning teams shall EACH receive the payment whenever Robert Evans receives $35 Million in net profits from any film produced to show the corruption and conspiracy involved in the misappropriation of confidential information belonging to Robert Evans.

 

 

Method Of Submission

1.  All types of submissions are accepted ONLY after the payment of the $250 entry fee is received, and the delivery address is provided to the contestant or team of contestants.

2.  Submissions received after the awarding of a particular cash prize, are disqualified for that particular cash prize.  Submissions received after all cash prizes are awarded, are disqualified for all cash prizes.

3.  All submissions shall become the property of Robert Evans

4. No refunds will be provided of the entry fee.

 

Method Of Payment

1.  There is no guarantee that any, or enough, net profits will be received by Robert Evans to pay the cash prizes.

 

Method Of Judging

1.  Any submissions of evidence, information, and explainations that are substantially similar to evidence, information, or explaination, that have been otherwise and independently obtained by Robert Evans, at a prior date, do not qualify.

2.  Submissions of evidence, information, or explainations, submitted before payment of entry fee, do not qualify.

3.  Bonus Judging Points will be awarded for the following types of submissions:

official documents, sworn affidavits, video recordings, audio recordings, etc.

 

Method Of Paying $250 Entry Fee

1.  Click "CONTEST ENTRY FEE" AT THE TOP OF THIS PAGE.

 

 

TAGS:

 

william r. hearst III, james h. herbert III, maurice kanbar, fred m. levin, lobbyists, howard roffman, san francisco chronicle, san francisco examiner, san francisco bay guardian, salon, barbara tomber, penelope wang, san francisco film society, toby rosenblatt, founders, graham leggat, donald fisher, peter scarlet, dianne feinstein, richard blum, coldwell banker richard ellis, roxanne messina captor, ed blakely, linda blackaby, rachel rosen, walt disney, wells fargo, van jones, mayfield fund, august capital, draper fisher jurvetsons, charles river ventures, tom perez-giese, westward magazine, meredith mcgehee, kenneth feinstein, hillary rodham clinton, jack abramoff, taylor branch, albert gore, political scandal, corruption, carlyle group, alex jones, ken garcia, brian copeland. federal investigation, trade secrets, economic espionage, media, michael moore, proprietary, bounty hunter, adventure, formula, pattern, design, computer hacking, processes, software, know how, warren hellman, haas, tides foundation, first republic bank, zurich american insurance company, george gund III, j. patterson mcbaine, james wesley kinnear, doug biejerbeck, craig middleton, karen cook, celeste meier, melanie blum, frank caufield, john m. diefenbach, dale djerassi, carla emil, sid ganis, brian ross, american broadcasting news, john murtha, center for investigative reporting, center for responsive politics, james grimaldi, jerry kammer, copley news service, san diego union tribune, chitra ragavan, us news and world report, marcus stern, bill walsh, times picayune, los angeles time, washington post, randy duke cunningham, darleen druyun, robert w. ney, david h. safavian, neil g. volz, mitch wade, saxby chambliss, jack quinn, albert gore, harkin energy, christopher dood, terry mcauliffe, carret asset management, alan quasha, rudolph giuliani, whowhatwhy, eliot spitzer

 

 

 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CLICK TO GO TO BLOG

 

 


 

 

 

 

OLD TOPICS:

 

 

Everyone who pledges a suggested minimum donation of $100, may ask a question pertaining to "evidence," relating to "Revealing The Biggest Crime In American History Without Exposing The Victim(s)' Business Or Technological Secrets."Each question will receive a grade of (1) "useless", (2) "not very helpful", (3) "helpful", (4) "very helpful", or (5) "extremely helpful". Robert Evans, the mashup creator, must grade each question; but is free to answer, or not answer any question. And he may or may not explain why he choses to answer, or not answer a question. All questioners will be identified by their real or fictional name (whichever each person chooses), along with their donation amount and the grading of his/her question(s). Particular questions asked may, or may not be identified, at the discretion of the mashup creator, Robert Evans. Fifteen percent of each donation will be paid to the mashup creator, Robert Evans, for providing services. Further communications will be done through email.  Click on the following link to go to our Secure email form  http://www.biggestcrime.com/ssl.html

 

Separately, auctions will be conducted for bidders to pledge donations to nonprofits. Highest bidder(s) win the right to choose which past or present criminal case(s) shall be studied, by comparison, to determine if the subject of this mashup truly is the "Biggest Crime In American History".50% of the proceeds of all online auctions, and 25% of the proceeds of all offline auctions, . 25% of all proceeds will be used to fund the studies. All final decisions regarding the studies will be made by Robert Evans, the mashup creator.



Additional information about selected donors will be published on website(s) through the process below:

"What We The Donors Do"

Click on the following link to go our Secure email form to enter your own content in a form  http://www.biggestcrime.com/ssl.html  Consider explaining briefly what your business is about. What are your strengths and specialties? What makes your business unique, and why are you the best at what you do?  Limit your description to a few highlights, like this:

• Free consultations

• Award-winning service

• Satisfaction guarantee




Email us if you wish to organize auction(s)  or engage us for other special events.

Class-Action Lawsuit---Bay Area Actors and Filmmakers

 

 

For those who support and wish to become involved in a GRASS-ROOTS effort to organize a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Northern California filmmakers, actors, extras, crew people, businesses, and others who have sufferered financial loss because of fraud and other misconduct that prevented or greatly reduced the amount of major film and television production activity in the San Francisco Bay Area and Northern California.  Prospective defendants are billionaire(s), multi-millionares, organizations, and managers/decision makers, associated with the Presidio Trust.  We will begin to meet in a temporary, less than adequate location until someone offer a free and more suitable space.  To insure serious participation by others, and to kick-start the fundraising process, there is a $20 annual membership fee.

RECOMMEDED BOOK:  BOOK #5000      CODE  NAME:  B5000    CLICK HERE

 

 

 

 

 

 

<a href="http://spn.tw/p4kjG"><img src="https://app.sponsoredtweets.com/images/hire_me_badge.png" alt="SponsoredTweets hire me badge" style="border: 0;" width="125" height="125" /></a>